Seven days of conversation about Katie Hobbs and Andy Biggs, split between posts that can be placed in Arizona and posts from the rest of the country. Both run negative everywhere, and the week is organised around a debate only one of them attended.
TOTAL VOLUMEPosts, articles and comments across all geographies. Only 4% of the U.S. portion is original writing; the rest is reposts and replies.
-25.8
BIGGS, NATIONALNet sentiment outside Arizona. -14.3 on posts naming them alone.
-62.3
HOBBS, NATIONALNet sentiment outside Arizona. -75.7 on posts naming them alone.
13K
BIGGEST DAYVolume on Oct 7, the night of a televised debate the incumbent did not attend.
What The Polls Say
Published polling, shown to set context. A poll asks a sample of voters which
candidate they intend to support. Everything else on this page measures something different: the
balance of positive and negative labeled posts about each candidate in the captured conversation.
A candidate can lead the vote and still take the worse of the argument online, and where the two
diverge this page explains the conversation, not the electorate.
HighGround · field date Aug 25, 2026 · 400 LV · margin of error 4.9 points
Hobbs leads the polling average by about 8 points while taking much the worse of the conversation, 41 points behind Biggs in Arizona. The comparison is weaker here than anywhere else on this page: Arizona's most recent public poll was fielded on August 25, six weeks before this window, so the two measures do not cover the same days.
The Week In One Line
Net sentiment runs on the left axis from −100 to +100. Gold bars carry total daily
volume for both candidates combined; hover any bar for the narratives driving that day. Biggs climbs through the weekend and collapses on Wednesday, the night he debated an empty podium. Hobbs is negative every day of the week.
Biggs net sentimentHobbs net sentimentTotal posts, articles and comments
Inside Arizona
Posts whose geography resolves to Arizona. The labeled share here is the highest in this series, so these meters rest on firmer ground than most.
ARIZONA
Biggs
Arizona
3,487posts
620 positive
1,073 negative
Hover a segment
1,831 unique authors · 217 original posts
(6% of volume; the rest are reposts and replies).
Sentiment from 1,693 labeled posts, 48.6% of this slice;
stored sample behind the labels 172 documents.
Top 3 narratives driving sentiment
1
An Empty Podium
POSITIVE DRIVER
His strongest Arizona material is about his opponent not being there. A televised debate went ahead with one candidate, and he spent the week naming the absence.
It’s a disgrace that Katie Hobbs and John Giles have refused to debate. They have no plan and no vision.
The case he makes in Arizona is a numbered list: a state ranking, a count of vetoed tax cuts, and a school-choice fight. It is the most itemized argument on this page.
The Hobbs Record: 45th in affordability, vetoing tax cuts 3 times.
Last night, I made the case directly to Arizonans that we deserve better than Katie Hobbs. Sine Kerr and I have a plan to make our state more affordable.
Arizona’s case against him is a congressional voting record, and the specific votes raised are old ones that opponents reproduce rather than characterize.
If you want to pretend that Andy Biggs didn’t vote against a spousal rape law, I won’t let you. Biggs was one of only 3 nos.
The Republican nominee for governor, U.S. Rep. Andy Biggs, is blaming Gov. Katie Hobbs for longstanding state trooper funding issues that date back years.
3,453 unique authors · 329 original posts
(4% of volume; the rest are reposts and replies).
Sentiment from 2,884 labeled posts, 36.6% of this slice;
stored sample behind the labels 292 documents.
Top 3 narratives driving sentiment
1
The Chair She Did Not Take
NEGATIVE DRIVER
Her in-state negative cell outnumbers her positive one five to one, and the single largest reason is a debate she declined. Her opponent made the absence the message and Arizona carried it.
Tonight, voters will get to hear my plan and vision for Arizona on the debate stage. They won’t hear from Katie Hobbs because she has no plan. She’s a coward and a failed governor.
What positive Arizona coverage she gets is the job rather than the campaign: a trade office opening, a get-out-the-vote rally with the attorney general. Local television reports it without adjectives.
Gov. Katie Hobbs joined Taiwanese leaders at the opening of an economic and cultural office to aid Taiwanese businesses and citizens in the region.
The policy attacks on her in Arizona are specific and administrative: education savings accounts, three vetoed tax cuts, and a shortfall in state trooper funding she says predates her.
Katie Hobbs wants to destroy school choice. Andy Biggs will get resources to those who need them.
The same week reads differently depending on where you stand. Net sentiment is plotted
from Arizona on the left to the rest of the country on the right; the solid line counts every post
naming a candidate, the dashed line counts only posts that name that candidate and not the other.
All posts naming the candidate
Posts naming that candidate only
-0.9Andy BiggsArizona minus national · -1.6 on single-subject posts
Biggs reads within a point of the same at home and nationally, the flattest profile in this series. The single-subject test lifts both figures by 11 points, which says the shared posts are dragging him down rather than propping him up.
-5.6Katie HobbsArizona minus national · -15.0 on single-subject posts
Hobbs reads about six points worse at home than nationally, and the single-subject test makes both much worse: -90.7 in Arizona on posts that name her alone. Almost nothing in this corpus argues for her except her own account.
What each audience actually argues about
Geography, not party. Both columns cover the same week and the same two candidates; what separates them is which arguments actually travel.
IN ARIZONA
Schools, Vetoes And A Trooper Shortfall
Arizona argues about administration: education savings accounts, three vetoed tax cuts, and who is responsible for a funding gap that predates the governor.
Education savings accountsA school-choice fight conducted in the state’s own acronyms.
Katie Hobbs wants to destroy school choice. Andy Biggs will get resources to those who need them.
A debate with one participant organised the entire week. Arizona and the country read this race almost identically, which is rare here and suggests the local conversation has already been absorbed into the national one.
The Rest Of The Country
Posts placed elsewhere in the United States. The national conversation is roughly four times the Arizona one and reads almost identically, which is unusual.
NATIONAL
Biggs
Rest of United States
10,826posts
1,620 positive
2,749 negative
Hover a segment
6,259 unique authors · 580 original posts
(5% of volume; the rest are reposts and replies).
Sentiment from 4,369 labeled posts, 40.4% of this slice;
stored sample behind the labels 560 documents.
Top 3 narratives driving sentiment
1
The Debate He Had To Himself
POSITIVE DRIVER
Nationally the absence is the story too, and his own page is the main distributor of it. His account produces more of his national volume than any news outlet does.
Tonight, voters will get to hear my plan and vision for Arizona on the debate stage. They won’t hear from Katie Hobbs because she has no plan.
Internal polling claiming he is within reach circulates widely without a public pollster attached, which is worth saying plainly: these are campaign numbers, not surveys.
New Hobbs internal has sent the Dems in Arizona into full panic. Biggs is well within the margin of error.
He spent the week answering advertising rather than setting an agenda, which is itself the shape of his national cell: reactive, and mostly his own voice.
Katie Hobbs is spending millions of dollars to lie about me because she has nothing to offer Arizonans. No plan, no vision. Nothing.
16,546 unique authors · 965 original posts
(3% of volume; the rest are reposts and replies).
Sentiment from 11,497 labeled posts, 37.0% of this slice;
stored sample behind the labels 1,415 documents.
Top 3 narratives driving sentiment
1
A Coward And A Failed Governor
NEGATIVE DRIVER
Her national cell is the largest on this page and most of it is her opponent’s own account. The language is about character and attendance rather than policy.
They won’t hear from Katie Hobbs because she has no plan. She’s a coward and a failed governor.
Her own national message is biographical, and it is the clearest thing she published all week: a career before politics, set against career politicians.
As a social worker, I saw firsthand how self-interested career politicians like Andy Biggs were failing to address the challenges Arizona families faced.
National conservative outlets cover her veto record rather than her agenda, which is how a governing act becomes a campaign liability outside the state it applies to.
GOP Arizona gubernatorial candidate Andy Biggs slams incumbent Gov. Katie Hobbs for vetoing common-sense legislation.
This page is the product of two different kinds of work. One half is data that no public API makes available; the other half is judgment about what the data does and does not support.
What Quid made possible
None of the following could be assembled from public endpoints inside a week.
One corpus, seven channels59K posts, articles and comments from X, Facebook, Instagram, Bluesky, Reddit, YouTube and news sites, answered as a single query.
Geography at the post levelSeparating 3,487 Arizona posts about Biggs and 7,873 about Hobbs from the 41,877 placed elsewhere is what makes a state-versus-national read possible.
Sentiment aimed at a personScoring sentiment toward a named figure rather than toward the post as a whole, across roughly 20,400 labeled posts, the highest labeled share in this series.
A sensitivity test in one passRe-running every figure on posts naming one candidate only moved the two men 11 and 23 points in opposite directions, which no single measurement would have shown.
Amplification, countedUnique-author and original-post metrics showed only 4% of this conversation is original writing.
The receiptsEvery cited post came back with its URL, author, channel and engagement count, which is why this page can link its evidence.
What Claude was responsible for
The data does not interpret itself, and it arrives with traps in it.
Disambiguating two ordinary surnamesBare "Hobbs" and "Biggs" both return far more than the full names, so each is gated to an Arizona race cue and the additions were sampled before use.
Labelling campaign polling as campaign pollingBoth claimed leads this week come from internal surveys. The page says so rather than reporting them as polls.
Reading the postsDocuments across eight cells read to derive 12 narratives and 7 daily storylines, and to place every quote against the sentiment it actually supports.
Noticing whose voice a cell isHobbs’ largest cell is mostly her opponent’s own Facebook account. The narratives attribute it rather than reading it as public opinion about her.
Handling an old vote carefullyA decade-old House vote is a real part of this week. It is reported as what opponents raise, with the claim attributed rather than asserted.
Checking and shippingEvery citation audited for liveness, then layout, charts, gauges, tooltips and publication.
Neither half can establish cause. This page measures what was said, how much of it there was, and who said it. It is not a poll, it does not model turnout, and it does not predict the November result.
How to read this
Source. Quid, run against the full-resolution recent index. Each person is defined
by an ad-hoc boolean query with primary: sentiment targeting, so the sentiment is scored
toward that named figure rather than toward the post as a whole.
Window. Oct 2 - Oct 8, 2026, seven complete day buckets. Quid closes its day at 23:00 UTC and
ignores the timezone parameter, so each bucket covers roughly 23 hours of the labeled calendar day.
Net sentiment is (positive − negative) / (positive + negative) × 100, computed on
labeled posts only. Neutral posts are excluded from the meter but counted in the volume figures.
Sentiment coverage. Sentiment labels cover 49 to 40% of Biggs's posts and 37 to 37% of Hobbs's.
Nothing here is thin. 172 stored documents sit behind Biggs' Arizona labels and 292 behind Hobbs', and the national cells rest on 560 and 1,415. Arizona's labeled share, 37 to 49%, is the highest in this series.
Classifier attribution is imperfect. In a two-candidate race most posts name both people, and
the classifier sometimes assigns a post's sentiment to the wrong subject, and several posts attacking one
candidate are labeled positive for them. Every soundbite shown here was read and placed against the narrative
it actually supports, but the donut and meter totals are the classifier's unedited output.
Twitter/X counts are projected ×10 from a 10% sample, so volume figures exceed the number of
individually stored documents. Counts and samples are never mixed inside one ratio.
Sensitivity test. 67% of Biggs's posts and 25% of Hobbs's name both candidates, where the classifier can credit sentiment to the wrong one. Re-running every figure on posts that name one
candidate only moves the two men in opposite directions. Biggs improves from -26.8 to -15.9 in Arizona and from -25.8 to -14.3 nationally; Hobbs falls from -68.0 to -90.7 at home and from -62.3 to -75.7 nationally. Two thirds of Biggs' posts name both candidates, and those shared posts are the only thing holding her figures up.
Volume is amplification, not voices. Only 4% of posts are original; the rest are reposts and replies. Unique-author counts
are shown on every panel and are the better measure of how many people are actually talking.
Link integrity. Every source link on this page was checked for liveness at publication.
Exploratory. Figures may not match Quid's own dashboards exactly. Sentiment is a
measure of how people are talking, not a poll, and nothing here projects a November result.