Seven days of conversation about Joe Lombardo and Aaron Ford, split between posts that can be placed in Nevada and posts from the rest of the country. This is the quietest race on the microsite at 16K posts, and the one where a single Democratic endorsement of the Republican did most of the week's work.
TOTAL VOLUMEPosts, articles and comments across all geographies. Only 10% of the U.S. portion is original writing; the rest is reposts and replies.
+50.0
LOMBARDO, NATIONALNet sentiment outside Nevada. +47.8 on posts naming them alone.
+22.7
FORD, NATIONALNet sentiment outside Nevada. +25.2 on posts naming them alone.
3K
BIGGEST DAYWednesday, Oct 7. Volume peaks at 3,464 posts as a Democratic district attorney's endorsement of Lombardo circulates and Lombardo records his best figure of the week.
What The Polls Say
Published polling, shown to set context. A poll asks a sample of voters which candidate they intend to support. Everything else on this page measures something different: the balance of positive and negative labeled posts about each candidate in the captured conversation. A candidate can lead the vote and still take the worse of the argument online, and where the two diverge this page explains the conversation, not the electorate.
Noble Predictive Insights · field date Oct 6, 2026 · 708 LV · margin of error 3.7 points
The polling average is tied at 42 percent each, on two polls. The conversation is not close: Lombardo reads 44 points better than Ford inside Nevada. Both readings rest on very little, with 77 stored documents behind Lombardo's in-state figure, and his best day collapses by 60 points once a single endorsement stops circulating.
The Week In One Line
Net sentiment runs on the left axis from −100 to +100. Gold bars carry total daily
volume for both candidates combined; hover any bar for the narratives driving that day. Lombardo climbs through the week to +74.3 on Wednesday and gives it all back by Friday. Ford's line is flatter and never clears +51.
Lombardo net sentimentFord net sentimentTotal posts, articles and comments
Inside Nevada
Nevada is the only state here that reads its Republican clearly positive and its Democrat at almost exactly zero.
NEVADA
Lombardo
Nevada
2,600posts
550 positive
220 negative
Hover a segment
1,073 unique authors · 170 original posts
(7% of volume; the rest are reposts and replies).
Sentiment from 770 labeled posts, 29.6% of this slice;
stored sample behind the labels 77 documents.
Top 3 narratives driving sentiment
1
A Democrat Endorses The Republican
POSITIVE DRIVER
Clark County's Democratic district attorney endorsed Lombardo, and that single item is the most circulated thing in Nevada all week. It appears in all four cells of this race because it names both men, and it is why Lombardo peaks mid-week.
Clark County District Attorney Steve Wolfson, a Democrat, just endorsed Republican Gov. Joe Lombardo for reelection in Nevada, over Democrat Aaron Ford.
Lombardo's own account runs a consistent fiscal line against Ford, pairing a claim that the state is short of money with a figure for Ford's proposals. It is the most specific policy argument either campaign makes in-state.
Aaron Ford says Nevada is broke, yet he's proposed $18 billion in priority policies.
Lombardo's in-state negative cell is the smallest in the race, and what is in it is largely about his association with the president rather than about Nevada. There is not enough here to characterize an opposition.
852 unique authors · 110 original posts
(5% of volume; the rest are reposts and replies).
Sentiment from 770 labeled posts, 37.9% of this slice;
stored sample behind the labels 77 documents.
Top 3 narratives driving sentiment
1
A PAC Runs The Case Against Him
NEGATIVE DRIVER
Most of the in-state criticism of Ford comes from one political action committee posting an itemized charge sheet: days spent out of state, spending, and alleged ethics violations. The same post recurs across his cells.
420-plus days traveling out of state. Hundreds of thousands in donor and special interest funds spent. 18 alleged ethics violations.
The most damaging specific claim against Ford concerns a clemency decision, and its force comes from the assertion that members of his own party objected. It is the mechanism behind the endorsement story rather than a separate issue.
Even soft-on-crime Democrats are publicly breaking with Aaron Ford over his clemency bid.
Where Ford sets the agenda it is on cost of living, campaigning in Las Vegas with national Democrats ahead of early voting. It is the one in-state thread he originates rather than answers.
Buttigieg joins Ford at Las Vegas business to talk affordability.
The same week reads differently depending on where you stand. Net sentiment is plotted
from Nevada on the left to the rest of the country on the right; the solid line counts every post
naming a candidate, the dashed line counts only posts that name that candidate and not the other.
All posts naming the candidate
Posts naming that candidate only
-7.1Joe LombardoNevada minus national · -7.4 on single-subject posts
Lombardo is the only candidate on this microsite who reads clearly positive in both halves, +42.9 at home and +50.0 nationally, and the single-subject test leaves both roughly intact. The caution is the base: 77 stored documents inside Nevada. The direction is solid; the size is not.
-24.0Aaron FordNevada minus national · -44.1 on single-subject posts
Ford reads 24 points better outside Nevada than inside it, and his in-state figure falls to -18.9 once Lombardo's name is removed. The state is arguing about his record as attorney general, specifically a clemency decision; the rest of the country is mostly discussing early voting logistics.
What each audience actually argues about
Geography, not party. Both columns cover the same week and the same two candidates; what separates them is which arguments actually travel.
IN NEVADA
A Clemency Bid And A Broken Ranks Endorsement
Nevada is arguing about Ford's record in office. A clemency decision, days spent out of state, and a Democratic prosecutor who crossed the aisle because of it. Lombardo's own ground is spending.
The Wolfson endorsementThe week's single most circulated item, and the pivot of the race.
The clemency bidThe specific decision that endorsement is attributed to.
Days out of stateA PAC charge sheet repeated across Ford's in-state cells.
The $18 billion figureLombardo's fiscal attack, and his most specific policy claim.
REST OF THE U.S.
Distance From Trump, And A Price Rise
Nationally the race is two things: whether Lombardo can hold a two-point lead while separating from the president, and a syndicated story about health insurance going up 17 percent. In a 16K-post corpus, one wire story is visible in the totals.
Escaping Trump's orbitThe national framing of Lombardo, carried by polling commentary.
A 17 percent rate riseOne Center Square story reprinted into both candidates' national cells.
Early voting pushNational Democrats in Las Vegas, which is what lifts Ford's national figure.
Tenure as an argumentThe attack on Ford nationally is about how long Nevada Democrats have held office.
Both columns are reacting to one endorsement and one wire story. Nevada argues about why a Democratic prosecutor crossed over; the rest of the country treats the same fact as evidence in a national argument about incumbency.
The Rest Of The Country
Both candidates read better outside Nevada than inside it, and the national cells are carried by one syndicated story about health insurance prices.
NATIONAL
Lombardo
Rest of United States
5,981posts
972 positive
324 negative
Hover a segment
3,367 unique authors · 736 original posts
(12% of volume; the rest are reposts and replies).
Sentiment from 1,296 labeled posts, 21.7% of this slice;
stored sample behind the labels 223 documents.
Top 3 narratives driving sentiment
1
Distance From Trump Is The National Frame
NEGATIVE DRIVER
Outside Nevada the question about Lombardo is whether he can separate himself from the president while holding a two-point lead. Polling commentary rather than campaign material carries it.
Lombardo tries to escape Trump's orbit; up 2 over Ford.
A Center Square piece on a projected 17 percent rise in Nevada health insurance rates was syndicated widely and lands in both candidates' national cells. In a corpus this small, one syndicated story is a visible share of the total.
Health insurance rates through Nevada's public Health Link program are set to rise 17 percent.
The Wolfson endorsement was picked up by commentary outlets well beyond Nevada, framed as a story about Ford's record as attorney general rather than about Lombardo's record as governor.
Why Nevada's top Democratic prosecutor won't back Aaron Ford for governor. Clark County's DA endorsed Republican Joe Lombardo today.
1,804 unique authors · 373 original posts
(11% of volume; the rest are reposts and replies).
Sentiment from 1,368 labeled posts, 40.6% of this slice;
stored sample behind the labels 214 documents.
Top 3 narratives driving sentiment
1
He Reads Better Outside Nevada
POSITIVE DRIVER
Ford's national figure of +22.7 is 24 points better than his in-state reading, and it holds up under the stricter test. National Democratic organizing coverage carries it, with early voting as the hook.
Buttigieg, Warnock, Slotkin and Nevada Democrats energize voters before the in-person early voting period kicks off.
The national case against Ford is not about him specifically. It lists Nevada Democrats by their years in office and treats length of tenure as the charge, which is why his national cells contain so little that is about his record.
Blame the Democrats: Susie Lee, eight years in power. Steven Horsford, 21 years. Dina Titus, 38 years. Jacky Rosen, ten years.
The same Center Square piece on health insurance prices sits in Ford's national cells as well. In a race this quiet, two candidates sharing one syndicated story is a meaningful share of the week's national volume.
Nevada's health insurance rates projected to rise 17 percent.
This page is the product of two different kinds of work. One half is data that no public API makes available; the other half is judgment about what the data does and does not support.
What Quid made possible
None of the following could be assembled from public endpoints inside a week.
A small race measured properly16K posts split by geography, where most tools would report the state as having no conversation at all.
Sentiment aimed at the personEach candidate is defined once, centrally, with primary-term targeting.
Daily movement on a thin baseSeven aligned buckets that show Lombardo gaining 70 points and losing them again inside one week.
The documents behind each cellStored posts per cell, which is how a single endorsement was traced through all four of them.
What Claude was responsible for
The data does not interpret itself, and it arrives with traps in it.
Refusing to treat +74.3 as popularityIt is one endorsement circulating for two days. The page says so and shows it collapsing by Friday.
Reading Ford correctlyHis roughly even in-state figure drops 18 points under the single-subject test, and the page leads with that.
Naming the syndicationOne wire story about insurance appears in both candidates' national cells and is identified rather than counted as interest.
Stating the size of the base22 stored documents in one cell. That is reported in three places rather than hidden behind a decimal.
Neither half can establish cause. This page measures what was said, how much of it there was, and who said it. It is not a poll, it does not model turnout, and it does not predict the November result.
How to read this
Source. Quid, run against the full-resolution recent index. Each person is defined
by an ad-hoc boolean query with primary: sentiment targeting, so the sentiment is scored
toward that named figure rather than toward the post as a whole.
Window. Oct 3 - Oct 9, 2026, seven complete day buckets. Quid closes its day at 23:00 UTC and
ignores the timezone parameter, so each bucket covers roughly 23 hours of the labeled calendar day.
Net sentiment is (positive − negative) / (positive + negative) × 100, computed on
labeled posts only. Neutral posts are excluded from the meter but counted in the volume figures.
Sentiment coverage. Sentiment labels cover 30 to 22% of Lombardo's posts and 38 to 41% of Ford's.
This is the smallest corpus on the microsite. Lombardo's in-state negative cell holds 22 stored documents and Ford's two in-state cells hold 38 and 39. Every figure here is a direction rather than a measurement, and the gaps matter more than the decimals.
Classifier attribution is imperfect. In a two-candidate race most posts name both people, and
the classifier sometimes assigns a post's sentiment to the wrong subject, and several posts attacking one
candidate are labeled positive for them. Every soundbite shown here was read and placed against the narrative
it actually supports, but the donut and meter totals are the classifier's unedited output.
Twitter/X counts are projected ×10 from a 10% sample, so volume figures exceed the number of
individually stored documents. Counts and samples are never mixed inside one ratio.
Sensitivity test. 19% of Lombardo's posts and 33% of Ford's name both candidates, where the classifier can credit sentiment to the wrong one. Re-running every figure on posts that name one
candidate only barely moves Lombardo, from +42.9 to +40.4 at home, but pushes Ford further down, from -1.3 to -18.9. Ford's roughly even in-state reading is therefore propped up by posts that also name Lombardo; on his own, Nevada reads him negative.
Volume is amplification, not voices. Only 10% of posts are original; the rest are reposts and replies. Unique-author counts
are shown on every panel and are the better measure of how many people are actually talking.
Link integrity. Every source link on this page was checked for liveness at publication.
Exploratory. Figures may not match Quid's own dashboards exactly. Sentiment is a
measure of how people are talking, not a poll, and nothing here projects a November result.