Seven days of conversation about Vivek Ramaswamy and Amy Acton, split between posts that can be placed in Ohio and posts from the rest of the country. Both candidates run negative in both halves, and the week is shaped less by either campaign than by a run of polls and a vice-presidential visit.
TOTAL VOLUMEPosts, articles and comments across all geographies. Only 5% of the U.S. portion is original writing; the rest is reposts and replies.
-0.8
RAMASWAMY, NATIONALNet sentiment outside Ohio. -10.8 on posts naming them alone.
-27.8
ACTON, NATIONALNet sentiment outside Ohio. -37.4 on posts naming them alone.
29K
BIGGEST DAYSunday, Oct 4. Volume peaks at 29K posts, and it is Acton's second-best day of the week at +43.1 before the attacks on her health-department record resume.
What The Polls Say
Published polling, shown to set context. A poll asks a sample of voters which candidate they intend to support. Everything else on this page measures something different: the balance of positive and negative labeled posts about each candidate in the captured conversation. A candidate can lead the vote and still take the worse of the argument online, and where the two diverge this page explains the conversation, not the electorate.
Siena College · field date Oct 4, 2026 · 616 LV · margin of error 4.5 points
The two measures disagree. Acton leads the polling average by about 6 points while reading 11 points worse than Ramaswamy in Ohio's conversation. Both candidates run negative in both halves, and Ramaswamy's near-neutral national figure is two hostile conversations cancelling rather than an absence of hostility.
The Week In One Line
Net sentiment runs on the left axis from −100 to +100. Gold bars carry total daily
volume for both candidates combined; hover any bar for the narratives driving that day. Ramaswamy's line stays within twenty points of zero all week. Acton's swings 122 points, from +46.6 on Monday to -75.4 on Wednesday.
Ramaswamy net sentimentActon net sentimentTotal posts, articles and comments
Inside Ohio
Ohio is harder on Acton than on Ramaswamy by eleven points, and the subject is almost entirely her tenure as state health director.
OHIO
Ramaswamy
Ohio
8,170posts
420 positive
520 negative
Hover a segment
3,361 unique authors · 400 original posts
(5% of volume; the rest are reposts and replies).
Sentiment from 940 labeled posts, 11.5% of this slice;
stored sample behind the labels 94 documents.
Top 3 narratives driving sentiment
1
Acton Attacks The Tax Plan Directly
NEGATIVE DRIVER
Acton's own account supplies the most substantive in-state criticism of Ramaswamy, and it is fiscal: that his tax promises shift the burden rather than reduce it.
Ramaswamy continues to make false promises to Ohioans about lower taxes. When you look at the numbers, his plans will just shift them.
The in-state case for Ramaswamy is largely declarative. Supporters state an intention to vote for him and a belief that he will keep the state Republican, with little policy attached.
I actually can't wait to vote for Vivek Ramaswamy here in Ohio. I have moved back here to help keep Ohio red.
A meaningful share of the material naming Ramaswamy in both halves is explicitly racial and xenophobic, including posts the classifier scored as positive toward Acton for that reason. It is not quoted here. It is recorded because it is a real and sizeable part of what was said, and because it inflates volume on both sides without being about either candidate's record.
Ohioans are frustrated with Acton too. That's why we will be voting for Vivek Ramaswamy for our next governor of Ohio.
2,977 unique authors · 360 original posts
(5% of volume; the rest are reposts and replies).
Sentiment from 1,740 labeled posts, 26.2% of this slice;
stored sample behind the labels 174 documents.
Top 3 narratives driving sentiment
1
The Pandemic Record Is The Whole Case
NEGATIVE DRIVER
Almost everything said against Acton inside Ohio returns to her time as state health director and the business closures that followed. It is argued with figures and it is the single most durable theme in her cells.
Amy Acton literally shut down Ohio and permanently closed over 28,000 Ohio small businesses.
Her supporters make no attempt to change the subject. The Columbus Dispatch opinion page put the two sides of it in one line, and that framing is the most circulated pro-Acton item of the week inside Ohio.
Acton saved Ohio lives. Ramaswamy's DOGE work shows how fast he'll discard them.
The secondary in-state attack concerns whether a professional licence was expired or suspended, pressed by state legislators. It is a narrow factual argument that occupies a disproportionate share of a cell this size.
An expired license is not the same as a suspended license. Only the BMV or a court can suspend a license.
The same week reads differently depending on where you stand. Net sentiment is plotted
from Ohio on the left to the rest of the country on the right; the solid line counts every post
naming a candidate, the dashed line counts only posts that name that candidate and not the other.
All posts naming the candidate
Posts naming that candidate only
-9.9Vivek RamaswamyOhio minus national · -6.5 on single-subject posts
Ramaswamy's -0.8 nationally is the nearest thing to a neutral reading on this microsite, and it is misleading. It is two hostile conversations of similar size cancelling, not an absence of hostility, and it falls to -10.8 once Acton's name is removed. Only 12 percent of his posts carry a sentiment label at all.
+6.0Amy ActonOhio minus national · +14.8 on single-subject posts
Acton reads negative in both halves and worse nationally than at home, -27.8 against -21.8, with the gap widening under the stricter test. Ohio and the country are arguing about the same thing, her record as state health director, and neither is persuaded by the defense that the record saved lives.
What each audience actually argues about
Geography, not party. Both columns cover the same week and the same two candidates; what separates them is which arguments actually travel.
IN OHIO
A Health Department, A Licence And A Tax Plan
Ohio argues about what Acton did in office and what Ramaswamy would do with it. Business closures, a professional licence, and whether his tax promises shift the burden. The in-state cells are the thinner half of this race.
The 28,000 businessesThe most durable claim against Acton, argued with a figure attached.
The Dispatch defenseHer supporters argue the same record rather than changing the subject.
The licence disputeA narrow factual argument that fills a disproportionate share of a small cell.
The tax planActon's own attack, and the most substantive in-state criticism of Ramaswamy.
REST OF THE U.S.
Polling, Money And A Retraction
Nationally the race is about whether it is winnable. Five unfavourable polls then one favourable one, rumours of advertising money leaving, and a super PAC conceding its claims about Acton were false.
The polling reversalOne survey after five, and the most circulated item in Ramaswamy's cells.
The advertising rumourUnsourced, widely repeated, and a fair sample of this corpus.
The super PAC admissionThe one factual concession either side made all week.
Energy standardsThe only forward-looking policy in Acton's national cells.
Both columns spent the week litigating 2020. Ohio argues about the closures themselves and the country argues about whether a campaign built on them is working, but neither conversation is about what either candidate would do as governor.
The Rest Of The Country
Ramaswamy's national figure is the closest to neutral on the microsite at -0.8. It is not approval; it is two hostile conversations cancelling out.
NATIONAL
Ramaswamy
Rest of United States
56,950posts
3,529 positive
3,583 negative
Hover a segment
31,004 unique authors · 2,999 original posts
(5% of volume; the rest are reposts and replies).
Sentiment from 7,112 labeled posts, 12.5% of this slice;
stored sample behind the labels 1,313 documents.
Top 3 narratives driving sentiment
1
Five Bad Polls, Then One Good One
POSITIVE DRIVER
The national story of Ramaswamy's week is polling. A run of five unfavourable surveys was followed by one showing him narrowly ahead, and that reversal is the single most circulated item in his cells.
Vivek Ramaswamy gets boost after five Ohio polling blows in a row. He edged out Democrat Amy Acton in a new poll of the Ohio governor's race.
Against the polling recovery ran a persistent rumour that national Republicans were preparing to withdraw advertising support. It is unsourced and it circulated widely, which is a fair description of much of this race's national volume.
Rumors in Ohio are spreading that the GOP will pull ad money out of the governor's race in the next week.
The organized Democratic argument against him is about who he would govern for. It is the most repeated structured criticism in his national cells and the counterweight to the polling recovery.
Vivek Ramaswamy is only interested in serving himself and his billionaire friends.
22,641 unique authors · 1,691 original posts
(4% of volume; the rest are reposts and replies).
Sentiment from 12,541 labeled posts, 30.4% of this slice;
stored sample behind the labels 1,865 documents.
Top 3 narratives driving sentiment
1
A Super PAC Concedes A Point
NEGATIVE DRIVER
The most consequential national item in Acton's cells is an admission that advertising against her contained false claims. Democratic organizations carried it hard, which is why it sits in her positive-scored cell despite being about an attack on her.
Ramaswamy's Super PAC admits to spreading lies about Dr. Amy Acton.
Where the national conversation engages with what Acton would do rather than what she did, the subject is restoring renewable energy and efficiency standards for utilities.
Amy Acton wants to restore Ohio's renewable energy and energy efficiency standards for electric utilities.
A large share of the national material about Acton is not about policy at all. Recurring nicknames about drinking and competence account for much of the repetition, which is why her national figure worsens once the test is tightened.
Do not vote for Amy Acton. She constantly lies and lacks what it takes to be governor.
This page is the product of two different kinds of work. One half is data that no public API makes available; the other half is judgment about what the data does and does not support.
What Quid made possible
None of the following could be assembled from public endpoints inside a week.
Two Ohio races separatedThe governor and Senate races share a state, a week and many of the same accounts, and are measured independently here.
Sentiment aimed at the personEach candidate is defined once, centrally, with primary-term targeting.
Daily movement at full resolutionSeven aligned buckets that capture a 122-point swing in one candidate inside three days.
The documents behind each figureStored posts per cell, which is how the low label coverage on one candidate became visible.
What Claude was responsible for
The data does not interpret itself, and it arrives with traps in it.
Not reading -0.8 as neutralityTwo hostile conversations cancelling is not an absence of hostility. The page says which it is.
Describing the racist material without repeating itA real and sizeable part of this corpus is explicitly racial. It is characterized and counted, not quoted.
Separating a retraction from a storyA super PAC admitting false claims is a different kind of fact from a poll, and the page treats it that way.
Marking an unsourced rumour as oneThe advertising-withdrawal claim circulated widely with no source, and is labelled accordingly.
Neither half can establish cause. This page measures what was said, how much of it there was, and who said it. It is not a poll, it does not model turnout, and it does not predict the November result.
How to read this
Source. Quid, run against the full-resolution recent index. Each person is defined
by an ad-hoc boolean query with primary: sentiment targeting, so the sentiment is scored
toward that named figure rather than toward the post as a whole.
Window. Oct 3 - Oct 9, 2026, seven complete day buckets. Quid closes its day at 23:00 UTC and
ignores the timezone parameter, so each bucket covers roughly 23 hours of the labeled calendar day.
Net sentiment is (positive − negative) / (positive + negative) × 100, computed on
labeled posts only. Neutral posts are excluded from the meter but counted in the volume figures.
Sentiment coverage. Sentiment labels cover 12 to 12% of Ramaswamy's posts and 26 to 30% of Acton's.
Ramaswamy's in-state cells are the thinner pair at 94 stored documents against Acton's 174. Only 12 percent of his posts carry a sentiment label at all, the lowest coverage in this race, so his near-zero readings rest on less than their volume suggests.
Classifier attribution is imperfect. In a two-candidate race most posts name both people, and
the classifier sometimes assigns a post's sentiment to the wrong subject, and several posts attacking one
candidate are labeled positive for them. Every soundbite shown here was read and placed against the narrative
it actually supports, but the donut and meter totals are the classifier's unedited output.
Twitter/X counts are projected ×10 from a 10% sample, so volume figures exceed the number of
individually stored documents. Counts and samples are never mixed inside one ratio.
Sensitivity test. 13% of Ramaswamy's posts and 18% of Acton's name both candidates, where the classifier can credit sentiment to the wrong one. Re-running every figure on posts that name one
candidate only pushes both candidates down rather than apart. Ramaswamy falls from -0.8 to -10.8 nationally and Acton from -27.8 to -37.4. Neither headline figure is being dragged down by the other candidate's presence, which in this race means the hostility is aimed at each of them directly.
Volume is amplification, not voices. Only 5% of posts are original; the rest are reposts and replies. Unique-author counts
are shown on every panel and are the better measure of how many people are actually talking.
Link integrity. Every source link on this page was checked for liveness at publication.
Exploratory. Figures may not match Quid's own dashboards exactly. Sentiment is a
measure of how people are talking, not a poll, and nothing here projects a November result.