Seven days of conversation about Tina Kotek and Christine Drazan, split between posts that can be placed in Oregon and posts from the rest of the country. This is the widest gap between two candidates on the microsite: roughly a hundred points in both halves, in a race the only recent poll puts within one point.
TOTAL VOLUMEPosts, articles and comments across all geographies. Only 3% of the U.S. portion is original writing; the rest is reposts and replies.
+59.9
DRAZAN, NATIONALNet sentiment outside Oregon. +28.7 on posts naming them alone.
-56.5
KOTEK, NATIONALNet sentiment outside Oregon. -60.5 on posts naming them alone.
20K
BIGGEST DAYSaturday, Oct 3. Volume peaks at 20K posts on the first debate's aftermath, and Drazan opens the week at +50.6 against Kotek at -55.7.
What The Polls Say
Published polling, shown to set context. A poll asks a sample of voters which candidate they intend to support. Everything else on this page measures something different: the balance of positive and negative labeled posts about each candidate in the captured conversation. A candidate can lead the vote and still take the worse of the argument online, and where the two diverge this page explains the conversation, not the electorate.
POLLING AVERAGE
No average is published for this race: too few polls inside the averaging window.
DHM Research · field date Sep 30, 2026 · 915 LV · margin of error 3.2 points
Oregon has no published polling average: three polls, none inside the averaging window. The most recent, DHM Research on September 30, puts Drazan ahead by 1 point, within its own margin of error. The conversation gap is 101 points. Roughly half of Drazan's national advantage disappears once posts naming Kotek are removed.
The Week In One Line
Net sentiment runs on the left axis from −100 to +100. Gold bars carry total daily
volume for both candidates combined; hover any bar for the narratives driving that day. Kotek is negative on all seven days and never rises above -36. Drazan is positive on six of them and peaks at +85.6 on Sunday.
Drazan net sentimentKotek net sentimentTotal posts, articles and comments
Inside Oregon
Oregon reads Drazan +40.4 and Kotek -60.8, and both figures rest on small bases. Drazan's in-state negative cell holds 14 stored documents.
OREGON
Drazan
Oregon
3,740posts
330 positive
140 negative
Hover a segment
1,430 unique authors · 160 original posts
(4% of volume; the rest are reposts and replies).
Sentiment from 470 labeled posts, 12.6% of this slice;
stored sample behind the labels 47 documents.
Top 3 narratives driving sentiment
1
Electricity Prices Are Her Best Line
POSITIVE DRIVER
Drazan's strongest in-state material is a specific claim about a lawsuit and a projected six percent rise in electricity prices. It was raised in the debate and originated with Oregon reporters rather than with her campaign.
During the debate, Drazan brought up Kotek joining a lawsuit that will drive a 6 percent hike in electricity prices for Oregonians.
A recurring note in her in-state cell is people stating they have not voted Republican before and will this time. In a state Democrats have held comfortably, that register is the thing worth noticing rather than the headline figure.
I never voted for Trump but I will vote for Drazan. Democrats are too comfortable here.
Drazan's in-state negative cell is the smallest in this race. Much of what is in it is not criticism of her at all but complaint about Oregon media coverage, which the classifier scores against her because she is the subject.
The Oregonian has become one of the major propaganda wings of the Democrat party in Oregon.
2,542 unique authors · 280 original posts
(4% of volume; the rest are reposts and replies).
Sentiment from 1,530 labeled posts, 20.7% of this slice;
stored sample behind the labels 153 documents.
Top 3 narratives driving sentiment
1
Her Wife's Role, Again
NEGATIVE DRIVER
The most damaging in-state story is a continuation of one Kotek apologized for two years ago: emails indicating her wife continued to hold an active role in the office. It is reported by Oregon writers rather than by the opposing campaign.
Tina Kotek apologized over handling of her wife's role two years ago. New emails show Aimee Kotek Wilson continued to play a leading role in 2026.
The second in-state charge is procedural: that a universal health plan governance process was kept out of public view until after ballots are returned. It is made by sitting legislators, which gives it more reach than a campaign claim.
Governor Kotek and Democrat leaders broke the law to hide their government-run healthcare takeover until after you vote.
Kotek's in-state positive cell holds 30 stored documents, and several of them are Drazan's own posts naming her. There is very little advocacy for the governor inside Oregon in this week's corpus.
It's been over 24 hours since I called for Portland City Councilor Mitch Green's resignation over his calls to abolish police and prisons.
The same week reads differently depending on where you stand. Net sentiment is plotted
from Oregon on the left to the rest of the country on the right; the solid line counts every post
naming a candidate, the dashed line counts only posts that name that candidate and not the other.
All posts naming the candidate
Posts naming that candidate only
-19.5Christine DrazanOregon minus national · +7.3 on single-subject posts
Drazan reads +40.4 at home and +59.9 nationally, but the national figure halves to +28.7 once Kotek's name is removed. 57 percent of her posts name both candidates, so much of her advantage is a measure of how badly Kotek is doing rather than how well she is. Her in-state cells are also the thinnest in the race at 47 stored documents.
-4.2Tina KotekOregon minus national · -1.5 on single-subject posts
Kotek is negative everywhere and the test does not rescue her: -60.8 at home, -56.6 nationally, and both get slightly worse on posts naming her alone. Unusually for this microsite, the damage is being done by her own state's press rather than by her opponent's campaign.
What each audience actually argues about
Geography, not party. Both columns cover the same week and the same two candidates; what separates them is which arguments actually travel.
IN OREGON
Emails, Electricity And A Health Plan
Oregon argues about governance. Whether the governor's wife still holds an informal role, whether a health plan process was kept quiet until after ballots return, and what a lawsuit will do to power bills. Nearly all of it originates with Oregon reporters.
The 2026 emailsA story Kotek already apologized for once, revived with new documents.
The health plan timingA procedural charge made by sitting legislators rather than the campaign.
A 6 percent rate riseDrazan's most specific claim, raised in the debate.
Crossover votersPeople stating they have not voted Republican before and will this time.
REST OF THE U.S.
A Check, A Poll And Three Debates
Nationally the race is a rematch worth watching. A million-dollar contribution, polling showing Drazan ahead, and syndicated local coverage of the debates. The syndication here carries substance rather than a campaign line, which is rare on this microsite.
The $1 million checkThe most concrete national story of the week.
"Wrong track"The polling finding most often dropped when the story is reposted.
The Medford debateCovered straight and syndicated across Oregon mastheads.
The La Grande gas taxA local fuel-tax fight standing in for the whole race.
Both columns are reading Oregon's own journalism. The difference is that in-state the reporting is a running argument about how the state is governed, and nationally the same pieces are read as evidence that a Democratic governor is in trouble.
The Rest Of The Country
The national halves run the same way and are carried by local news syndication rather than by national accounts.
NATIONAL
Drazan
Rest of United States
15,672posts
2,946 positive
739 negative
Hover a segment
7,756 unique authors · 432 original posts
(3% of volume; the rest are reposts and replies).
Sentiment from 3,685 labeled posts, 23.5% of this slice;
stored sample behind the labels 579 documents.
Top 3 narratives driving sentiment
1
The Money Arrived
POSITIVE DRIVER
A single million-dollar contribution reported late in the week is the most concrete national story in Drazan's cells, and it lands alongside polling showing her narrowly ahead in a rematch she lost in 2022.
Christine Drazan reports a $1 million check in a tight race for Oregon governor.
The polling coverage is consistent about two things: Drazan is ahead, and the direction of the state matters more to voters than either candidate. That second finding is the one most often dropped when the story is reposted.
Drazan leads Kotek in a poll, again, but 'wrong track' may sway more voters.
Oregon's local press covered the Medford debate carefully and the same piece was syndicated across regional mastheads. It is the rare case on this microsite where syndication spreads substance rather than a campaign line.
Kotek and Drazan outline opposing views in the Medford gubernatorial debate. Candidates touch on homelessness, SNAP benefits, data centers and education.
11,422 unique authors · 764 original posts
(3% of volume; the rest are reposts and replies).
Sentiment from 4,470 labeled posts, 18.3% of this slice;
stored sample behind the labels 713 documents.
Top 3 narratives driving sentiment
1
A Gas Tax In La Grande
NEGATIVE DRIVER
Oregon Public Broadcasting's reporting on a local fuel tax fight is the most substantive item in either candidate's national cells, and it is the clearest example of a specific local grievance standing in for the whole race.
Tensions over the La Grande gas tax tap into a debate shaping the tight Oregon governor race.
Facing a close race, Kotek's campaign turned to friendly online personalities, and the coverage of that decision travelled further than the message it was meant to carry.
Facing a tight race, Gov. Tina Kotek taps friendly influencers to spread her message.
What support exists is largely unamplified: individual endorsements on aggregator sites and coverage of her own commitments. None of it approaches the reach of the material against her.
Tina Kotek has my vote for Governor. Her governance always centers around the best interests of Oregon.
This page is the product of two different kinds of work. One half is data that no public API makes available; the other half is judgment about what the data does and does not support.
What Quid made possible
None of the following could be assembled from public endpoints inside a week.
A rematch measured twiceIn-state and national halves of the same week, on a race the polling puts within a point.
Sentiment aimed at the personEach candidate is defined once, centrally, with primary-term targeting.
The single-subject re-runThe test that showed half of Drazan's national advantage is borrowed from posts about her opponent.
Stored evidence per cellFourteen documents in one cell against 485 in another, which is how the asymmetry became measurable.
What Claude was responsible for
The data does not interpret itself, and it arrives with traps in it.
Not reporting a hundred-point raceThe conversation gap is roughly 100 points; the polling gap is about one. The page states both and explains the difference.
Halving the headline honestlyDrazan's national figure falls 31 points under the stricter test, and the page leads with that.
Noticing who is doing the damageKotek's negative comes from Oregon reporting rather than from Drazan's campaign, which is unusual and is said plainly.
Flagging a thin cell as thinFourteen stored documents cannot characterize an opposition, and the page does not pretend otherwise.
Neither half can establish cause. This page measures what was said, how much of it there was, and who said it. It is not a poll, it does not model turnout, and it does not predict the November result.
How to read this
Source. Quid, run against the full-resolution recent index. Each person is defined
by an ad-hoc boolean query with primary: sentiment targeting, so the sentiment is scored
toward that named figure rather than toward the post as a whole.
Window. Oct 3 - Oct 9, 2026, seven complete day buckets. Quid closes its day at 23:00 UTC and
ignores the timezone parameter, so each bucket covers roughly 23 hours of the labeled calendar day.
Net sentiment is (positive − negative) / (positive + negative) × 100, computed on
labeled posts only. Neutral posts are excluded from the meter but counted in the volume figures.
Sentiment coverage. Sentiment labels cover 13 to 24% of Drazan's posts and 21 to 18% of Kotek's.
Drazan's in-state cells are the thin ones: 33 stored positive documents and 14 negative. Her +40.4 is a direction and not a measurement. Kotek's cells are better supported, with 123 stored negative documents inside Oregon.
Classifier attribution is imperfect. In a two-candidate race most posts name both people, and
the classifier sometimes assigns a post's sentiment to the wrong subject, and several posts attacking one
candidate are labeled positive for them. Every soundbite shown here was read and placed against the narrative
it actually supports, but the donut and meter totals are the classifier's unedited output.
Twitter/X counts are projected ×10 from a 10% sample, so volume figures exceed the number of
individually stored documents. Counts and samples are never mixed inside one ratio.
Sensitivity test. 57% of Drazan's posts and 24% of Kotek's name both candidates, where the classifier can credit sentiment to the wrong one. Re-running every figure on posts that name one
candidate only costs Drazan most of her national advantage. She falls from +59.9 to +28.7 once posts naming Kotek are removed, because 57 percent of her posts name both. Kotek barely moves, from -56.6 to -60.5. The gap is real but roughly half of its national size is borrowed.
Volume is amplification, not voices. Only 3% of posts are original; the rest are reposts and replies. Unique-author counts
are shown on every panel and are the better measure of how many people are actually talking.
Link integrity. Every source link on this page was checked for liveness at publication.
Exploratory. Figures may not match Quid's own dashboards exactly. Sentiment is a
measure of how people are talking, not a poll, and nothing here projects a November result.