<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=1003172278004933&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
ELECTION NIGHT 2026
THE DATA BEHIND THE 2026 US MIDTERM ELECTIONS

The Midterms WereA Global Story

On Election Day 2026, 1.6M posts from 724K authors discussed the US midterms. Just over a fifth came from outside the United States, and those posts were about different things. This page breaks the night down by theme, by person and by where the poster was.

1.6MPOSTS
724KAUTHORS
5.5MENGAGEMENTS
25%FROM OUTSIDE THE US
192COUNTRIES
THE SHORT VERSION

What You Should Know, In One Paragraph

Across 27 hours on Election Day 2026, 1.6M posts from 724K authors discussed the US midterms, peaking at 119K posts in the 11PM ET hour as control of the House was called. 25% came from outside the United States, across 192 countries. Americans argued about turnout and fraud; the rest of the world talked about Iran, tariffs and technology. The angriest subject, election integrity & misinformation, was also among the least shared, and Donald Trump, who was not on any ballot, appeared in 23% of everything collected.

Figures may be quoted with attribution to Quid. They measure online conversation, not voting intention and not opinion in the electorate.

WHAT THE NIGHT LOOKED LIKE

Key Data Findings From The Analysis

119K

The Peak Came As The House Was Called

Volume climbed all evening and broke in the 11PM ET · 8PM PT hour. That single hour carried 7.6% of the whole window, 8.6 times the quietest hour's 14K.

44x

What Gets Posted Is Not What Lands

Tariffs & trade drew 5.18 engagements per post; Education & schools drew 0.12. Election integrity filled 41K posts and earned 19K engagements: loud, and largely ignored.

82

Election Integrity Was The Angriest Subject

Net sentiment of -81.9 on 2.7K labeled mentions, the most negative of the 16 themes measured. Results & race calls was the warmest at +44.9.

+14

The World Was Warmer Than America

Posts from outside the US ran +14.0 net sentiment against +7.3 inside it. Distance takes the edge off: the angriest themes are also the most American ones.

92%

Some Themes Barely Left The Country

Election integrity & misinformation was 92.2% American. AI & technology was the most international at 60.1%. The further a theme sits from the ballot, the further it travels.

HOUR BY HOUR

The Shape Of Election Day

Hover or tap any hour to see what was actually being posted in it, inside the US and outside, with links to the original posts.

POSTS PER HOUR · US EASTERN · US vs outside the US
United StatesOutside the US
12a1a2a3a4a5a6a7a8a9a10a11a12p1p2p3p4p5p6p7p8p9p10p11p12a1a2a

Buckets are pinned to US Eastern, which is how poll closings are reported, and labelled in both Eastern and Pacific in the hover. Twitter/X volume is projected from a 10% sample, here as everywhere on this page.

THEMES

What The Night Was About

Sixteen themes, eleven appearing in the campaign-week report. A post can belong to more than one theme, so the columns do not sum to the total.

TOP 10 THEMES BY POSTS
PositiveNeutralNegative hover a bar for example posts · net score at right
Turnout & voting access164,941 posts · 419K engagements
93%
+12
Foreign policy & Iran114,617 posts · 179K engagements
92%
-22
Results & race calls62,682 posts · 298K engagements
95%
+45
Immigration61,603 posts · 33K engagements
87%
+1
Election integrity & misinformation40,745 posts · 19K engagements
94%
-82
Economy & inflation39,196 posts · 43K engagements
9%81%9%
-0
Democracy & authoritarianism30,938 posts · 53K engagements
89%
-24
Crime & public safety28,297 posts · 5.2K engagements
11%80%
+17
Tariffs & trade16,641 posts · 86K engagements
23%56%21%
+3
AI & technology15,179 posts · 4.3K engagements
90%
+10

Bars show the positive/negative split of labeled mentions only. The net score is suppressed and marked thin below 250 labeled mentions, because a split on a handful of posts is noise.

TOP 10 THEMES BY ENGAGEMENTS
PositiveNeutralNegative hover a bar for example posts · net score at right
Turnout & voting access164,941 posts · 419K engagements
93%
+12
Results & race calls62,682 posts · 298K engagements
95%
+45
Foreign policy & Iran114,617 posts · 179K engagements
92%
-22
Tariffs & trade16,641 posts · 86K engagements
23%56%21%
+3
Democracy & authoritarianism30,938 posts · 53K engagements
89%
-24
Economy & inflation39,196 posts · 43K engagements
9%81%9%
-0
Trump referendum11,484 posts · 35K engagements
95%
-26
Immigration61,603 posts · 33K engagements
87%
+1
Healthcare14,121 posts · 23K engagements
92%
-41
Election integrity & misinformation40,745 posts · 19K engagements
94%
-82

Engagements are likes, comments, shares and views. The ordering differs sharply from the volume ranking.

US vs THE REST OF THE WORLD

Two Different Elections, Watched At Once

Americans watched a process story; everyone else watched a consequences story. Inside the United States the conversation was about the machinery of voting: election integrity & misinformation ran 92.2% American and turnout & voting access 88.9%. Those are arguments about whether the count can be trusted, and they barely crossed a border.

Outside the United States the same event was read for what it would change. Relative to its own conversation, the rest of the world over-indexed hardest on foreign policy & iran (+2.0 points against the US share) and ai & technology (+0.8) — a foreign war, trade and technology policy, not ballots. The mirror image holds: the US over-indexed on turnout & voting access (7.9 points) and immigration (2.5).

Tone follows the same line. Non-US posts ran +14.0 net sentiment against +7.3 inside the country. The further from the ballot, the cooler the temperature — distance buys detachment, and the angriest themes are the ones only Americans were having.

THEME MIX · SHARE OF EACH REGION'S OWN CONVERSATION
United StatesOutside the US
Turnout &voting access12.6% / 4.7%Foreign policy& Iran6.8% / 8.9%Results &race calls4.2% / 3.4%Immigration4.6% / 2.1%Election integrity& misinformation3.2% / 0.8%Economy &inflation2.5% / 2.6%Democracy &authoritarianism2.0% / 1.8%Crime &public safety2.0% / 1.3%

Composition, not volume: each theme is a share of its own region's conversation, because the American side is 3.9 times larger and would otherwise swallow the other shape. Each spoke is labelled US share first, then outside-US.

THE SAME THEMES, AS RAW VOLUME
Turnout & voting access
147K US18K outside
Foreign policy & Iran
8K US35K outside
Results & race calls
49K US14K outside
Immigration
53K US8.2K outside
Election integrity & misinformation
38K US3.2K outside
Economy & inflation
29K US1K outside
Democracy & authoritarianism
24K US7.3K outside
Crime & public safety
23K US5.1K outside
Tariffs & trade
1K US6.4K outside
AI & technology
9.1K US6.1K outside

Each bar is scaled to its own column's maximum, so the two rows read as rankings rather than against each other.

WHERE THE NON-US CONVERSATION CAME FROM · TOP 12 COUNTRIES

Each bar is the country's full post volume. The coloured segments are the themes above, and the two grey segments are the honest remainder: posts matching one of the other eight themes, and posts matching no measured theme at all. That last block is the largest almost everywhere, which is the finding — most of the conversation abroad was general election talk rather than any specific issue.

Turnout & voting accessForeign policy & IranResults & race callsImmigrationElection integrity & misinformationEconomy & inflationDemocracy & authoritarianismCrime & public safetyOther themesNo measured theme
India26,756 posts · 38% matched a theme
27K
Canada21,641 posts · 29% matched a theme
22K
United Kingdom16,349 posts · 35% matched a theme
16K
Mexico14,405 posts · 14% matched a theme
14K
Brazil8,883 posts · 19% matched a theme
8.9K
France8,697 posts · 24% matched a theme
8.7K
Spain7,061 posts · 16% matched a theme
7.1K
Australia7,044 posts · 32% matched a theme
7K
Japan6,621 posts · 34% matched a theme
6.6K
Argentina6,441 posts · 8% matched a theme
6.4K
South Africa5,181 posts · 25% matched a theme
5.2K
Nigeria5,141 posts · 39% matched a theme
5.1K

Themes overlap, so their raw counts are not a partition and cannot simply be stacked. The union of the themes is measured separately for each country, and the eight named segments are allocated inside that union in proportion to their own counts; hover any segment for its real post count. 177,872 further posts fall outside the United States but carry no country signal, so they sit in the non-US totals and not in this ladder.

THE SAME SPLIT, BY CHANNEL

Channel and geography are not independent. Twitter/X was 78% American, Bluesky 78%, Reddit 1% — but news coverage was only 58% American, because the world's press covered an American election. Read the night on X and you read a domestic argument; read it in news copy and you read an international story.

Twitter
1.1M US311K outside
News
41K US3K outside
Bluesky
24K US7K outside
Reddit
134 US24K outside
Forums
5.1K US4.7K outside
Facebook
6.6K US1.4K outside
Podcast
26 US7.8K outside
Instagram
2.6K US1.9K outside

Engagement per post splits the same way: Facebook ran 313.1 and Twitter/X 0.00. Volume lives on X; reach lives on Facebook and Instagram.

PEOPLE TALKED ABOUT

One Name On Nearly A Quarter Of The Night

Read these two charts against each other: the left one is attention, the right one is reach, and they do not agree. Donald Trump appears in 358,150 posts, 23.0% of everything collected, at -19.9 net sentiment — the most-named person of the night, and the most negatively discussed of those with enough labeled mentions to score. He was not on a ballot anywhere.

Behind him the order changes depending on what you count. Abdul El-Sayed is second by volume with 42,829 posts, but Abdul El-Sayed leads the field a reader would actually have seen. The takeaway for a story: being talked about and being read are different things, and a candidate who dominates mention counts can still be invisible in anyone's feed.

Treat the sentiment column carefully. 8 of the 20 names carry a thin marker: they were named often but drew too few sentiment-labeled mentions to score, so no number is shown rather than a number built on a handful of posts.

TOP 10 PEOPLE BY POSTS
PositiveNeutralNegativehover a bar for example posts
Donald Trump358,150 posts · 1.7M engagements · President
88%
-20
Abdul El-Sayed42,829 posts · 195K engagements · MI Senate, D
94%
-7
Ken Paxton27,491 posts · 41K engagements · TX Senate, R
97%
+27
James Talarico25,839 posts · 61K engagements · TX Senate, D
96%
+35
Karoline Leavitt21,206 posts · 2.8K engagements · White House press secretary
100%
thin
Barack Obama19,785 posts · 74K engagements · Former president
83%
-1
Joe Biden18,456 posts · 3.4K engagements · Former president
84%
-10
Stephen Miller14,786 posts · 3.2K engagements · White House deputy chief of staff
100%
thin
Kathy Hochul14,621 posts · 17K engagements · NY governor, D
82%15%
-71
Greg Abbott14,205 posts · 18K engagements · TX governor, R
97%
+15
TOP 10 PEOPLE BY ENGAGEMENTS
PositiveNeutralNegativehover a bar for example posts
Donald Trump358,150 posts · 1.7M engagements · President
88%
-20
Abdul El-Sayed42,829 posts · 195K engagements · MI Senate, D
94%
-7
Jon Ossoff10,351 posts · 153K engagements · GA Senate, D
97%
+33
Barack Obama19,785 posts · 74K engagements · Former president
83%
-1
James Talarico25,839 posts · 61K engagements · TX Senate, D
96%
+35
Ken Paxton27,491 posts · 41K engagements · TX Senate, R
97%
+27
Greg Abbott14,205 posts · 18K engagements · TX governor, R
97%
+15
Gina Hinojosa10,408 posts · 18K engagements · TX candidate, D
97%
+6
Kathy Hochul14,621 posts · 17K engagements · NY governor, D
82%15%
-71
Bruce Blakeman8,450 posts · 11K engagements · Nassau County executive, R
78%22%
-99

Counted by matching the person's name in post text with variants merged into one query, so "Trump", "Donald Trump" and "President Trump" are one row rather than three. Monitor's own entity panel reports different figures for these names because it is a separate annotation layer, not a post count; this page uses one measurement throughout so every number reconciles with the headline.

WHO WAS POSTING

People And Organizations, Separated By Their Own Timelines

Each account below was classified by reading its own posting history, not its display name. This cut covers Twitter and Reddit, the platforms whose timelines the profiler can reach; every name links to the account. Ranked by engagement earned in the window.

TOP 10 AUTHORS WHO ARE PEOPLE
🍸🐆@itscelyunique · 27K followers · individual person
65K
Benny Johnson@bennyjohnson · 4.2M followers · individual person
46K
philip lewis@Phil_Lewis_ · 457K followers · individual person
26K
Franco Urbaez@franco_urbaez · 23 followers · individual person
25K
Terrence K. Williams@w_terrence · 2.5M followers · individual person
2K
DataRepublican (small r)@DataRepublican · 1M followers · individual person
19K
ThePatrioticBlonde™🇺🇸@ImBreckWorsham · 197K followers · individual person
18K
Kye@GxldSociety · 13K followers · individual music artist or creator
17K
Eduardo Menoni@eduardomenoni · 1.2M followers · individual political commentator and content
13K
Pavan Goyal@Pavan_07goyal · 25K followers · individual person
1K

95 of the accounts read were individuals: commentators, creators and activists rather than institutions.

TOP 10 AUTHORS THAT ARE ORGANIZATIONS
Buzzing Pop@BuzzingPop · 289K followers · entertainment news outlet
33K
Commentary Trump Daily Posts@TrumpDailyPosts · 3M followers · Trump-focused political news outlet
29K
CNN@CNN · 62M followers · news outlet
26K
The Election Center@ElectionCenter_ · 11K followers · election analysis organization or outlet
22K
CNN Breaking News@cnnbrk · 6M followers · news outlet
15K
The Associated Press@AP · 17M followers · news outlet (The Associated Press)
14K
🇵🇸Nela🇸🇩🇨🇴@MoronNela · 49K followers · political news and commentary media account
4K
Justice Opportunity Liberty Politi@JOLPOLitico · 2.1K followers · political advocacy organization
750
N+ UNIVISION@nmasunivision · 2.1M followers · news outlet
680
Taqwa Essence@taqwaessence · political advocacy or campaign-promotion acc
500

22 were organizations: news outlets, campaigns, advocacy groups and one prediction market.

WHAT IS NOT IN THESE TWO LISTS

425 accounts could not be classified, most because they post more than the profiler samples; several are among the loudest in the window, so these leaderboards are not a complete ranking of the night: @nytimes, @hollywoodunlocked, @usatodaypolitics, @kamalaharris, @vanityfair, @FoxNews. A further 1 automated accounts were excluded by name (PoliticsModeratorBot), because a subreddit's automoderator is not a voice in the conversation.

TOP POSTS

The Ten Posts That Travelled Furthest

Ranked by total engagements inside the window, each shown in a fixed-height tile so the grid stays even however long the post runs; scroll inside a tile to read the rest. Every author name and every View link opens the original.

nytimes2026-11-04 05:02
Democrats seized control of the Senate on Tuesday night, as voters delivered a thorough rebuke to President Trump and handed the party victories in places long considered Republican strongholds. Democrats flipped Senate seats in Iowa, Kansas, Ohio, North Carolina, South Carolina and even Texas, according to The Associated Press, and were in a strong position to take control of the House as they scored victories up and down the ballot. Trump told The New York Times in an interview that he was “absolutely willing to accept those results” and was prepared to work with Democrats. At the link in our bio, read more updates on the midterm elections and analysis from our reporters.
338KENGAGEMENTSView on Instagram
hollywoodunlocked2026-11-03 15:21
Registered Republicans explain why they are voting Blue during the midterm elections. Thoughts? 👇🏾📸: joyannreid
215KENGAGEMENTSView on Instagram
kamalaharris2026-11-03 15:15
There is so much at stake in the midterm elections. If you have already voted: Thank you, and make sure your community is ready. If you haven’t voted yet, make sure you have a plan to vote today, Tuesday, November 3. Find your polling place at IWillVote.com. The power is with the people.
207KENGAGEMENTSView on Instagram
feministnews.us2026-11-03 15:45
Eleven billion dollars. That’s AdImpact’s estimate for what this midterm cost in advertising alone, before you count the mailers, the consultants, the private jets and the $190 million Elon Musk put into a single Senate race in Texas. One House seat in eastern North Carolina became the most expensive in American history at $52 million. Republicans and their allies spent $280 million of the total on ads about trans kids, an issue voters rank dead last. Here’s the math, using the Center for American Progress’s numbers on what a dollar actually buys. Eleven billion is a year of SNAP for about 5 million people. Or a year of federally subsidized housing for roughly 680,000 families. Or, if you’d rather, a decade of maintaining every rural hospital that has closed since 2023. Every one of those is a problem somebody spent the last six months campaigning on. Grocery prices. Rent. Hospitals. And the money that could have touched any of them went instead to 30-second spots telling you to be afraid of your neighbor. This isn’t a both-sides lament. One side raised $2.4 million in a day from 26,000 small donors after a congresswoman defected. The other had Musk. The question isn’t whether money is in politics. It’s whose, and what they expect for it. Polls are open. The cheapest thing in this election is your vote.
133KENGAGEMENTSView on Facebook
heathercoxrichardson2026-11-03 07:41
November 2, 2026 (Monday) Tomorrow is Election Day. Trump made his closing argument for the midterm elections in a speech today at the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool. The choice of location made Democratic consultants exultant. The reflecting pool has become a symbol of the Trump administration: an expensive boondoggle that failed immediately. After touting his experience as a developer and claiming he was an expert at building pools, Trump refused to accept the conclusion that the installation had been faulty—a conclusion the contractor agreed with—and instead insisted that vandals had ruined the project. Under his control, the Department of Justice went so far as to launch a criminal case against a man who reached into the pool to touch the liner. In October, a judge dismissed the case. Highlighting the reflecting pool in the last hours before Election Day recalled the Greek myth of Narcissus, the young hunter who falls in love with his own reflection in a pool and is unable to tear himself away. In today’s world, that choice also seemed to show Trump's conviction that he can shape the narrative according to which Americans act. But his speech seemed to prove the opposite. The very small audience heard Trump go on and on about the reflecting pool, showing photos of the repairs, seeming to want to convince people that he was the brilliant developer who had fixed a problem 100 years in the making and that his efforts had been beset by vandals. It's possible his speech writer intended for the theme to suggest that Trump was fixing the U.S. as he fixed the reflecting pool, but Trump's obvious interest was in his Washington, D.C., projects rather than the nation. He didn't move off the reflecting pool, algae, bubbles, granite, vandals, and liners for the first 16 minutes of his speech. He boasted of repairs he’s made to fountains, then turned to praise his planned “triumphal arch military complex,” his “National Garden of American Heroes” to be filled with statues of Americans he admires, and his new Washington, D.C., golf course. “[I]t’s a golden age of America,” he concluded. “We have a country that we can be proud of again. We were laughed at all over the world for four years. We were laughed at like we were stupid people. We were laughed at by every ruler, every president, every prime minister, every king, every queen, but they don't laugh anymore. Thank you very much, everybody.” We will not know the results of the midterm elections until after the polls close and votes are counted, but early voting and polling suggest this election will see a Democratic wave. Certainly, Republicans appear to be preparing for such an outcome. Alec Hernandez, Meredith Lee Hill, Erin Doherty, and Andrew Howard reported in Politico today that Republicans are bracing for big losses and are already privately blaming Trump. His trade wars, attacks on immigrants, killing of U.S. citizens, war on Iran, corruption, and alliance with Russia's President Vladimir Putin, as well as his lack of concern for the cost of his actions on the American people, have ruined his popularity and leave Republicans with little to run on. “We all know who the problem is,” a Republican strategist told the Politico journalists. “It’s Trump. And do we continue down a path of losing?” But this moment is far bigger than Trump. At key moments in American history, the majority of voters have woken to the reality that a small group of men has rigged the system to funnel the wealth produced by ordinary people into their own pockets. With that wealth, they have bought power and undermined democracy in favor of themselves. The potential for this perversion of the principles of the Declaration of Independence—that all people are created equal and have the right to an equal say in their government—became clear even before the creation of the United States of America. Shortly before the Revolutionary War, Daniel Boone had crossed the Appalachian Mountains and reported back to Virginians the miraculously rich resources of the land to the west, the land called “Kentucke.” When the Revolutionary War ended, settlers rushed to push aside Indigenous Americans and lay claim to Kentucky. Once there, they quickly discovered that equality was not the inevitable result of economic freedom. Some men settled on better land than others, some had family money, some were just lucky, and quickly, those men accumulated more than others. Along with their wealth, Kentucky’s landowners gained political power, which they used to secure legislation that promoted their interests at the expense of poorer settlers. Wealthy men came to control the government by working with lawmakers who shared their values and by buying the channels through which voters got information. Gradually, the laws they put in place circumscribed other men’s ability to rise, and wealth moved upward. Equality of opportunity faltered. In 1787, when the Articles of Confederation were still in force, the congress assembled under that document passed the Northwest Ordinance, which was designed to prevent wealthy men from dominating the new western lands. The measure outlawed both primogeniture—the system in which the oldest son alone inherited a family’s wealth— and slavery, systems that the men who wrote the Northwest Ordinance believed were instrumental in concentrating wealth. The men who wrote the Northwest Ordinance thought it would protect democracy, but over the next fifty years, a handful of wealthy enslavers tightened a stranglehold on the South. After 1854, when their intention to control the whole nation became obvious, Americans from a range of political parties came together to oust them from power. They created a government that worked to develop the economy from the bottom, educating young men and giving them land to farm. They tried to make America into a land where every man, regardless of race or background, could rise through hard work. They abolished human enslavement except as punishment for crime, then gave freedmen the vote to enable them to protect their own economic interests. They argued that a government “of the people, by the people, for the people,” had a responsibility to expand economic growth that benefited everyone. But that vision came under attack after the Civil War, as men who opposed Black rights began to insist that government-funded programs that protected formerly enslaved people and helped immigrants redistributed wealth from hardworking white taxpayers to the undeserving. Money and power again began to concentrate at the top of society, among those who became known as “robber barons.” When their control of the government helped to crash the economy in 1893, the American people once again came together to oust them from power, and the Progressive Era recreated a government intended to work for everyone. The same old pattern of demonizing Black Americans and immigrants for supposedly stealing tax dollars repeated. Men determined to control the country insisted that government regulations and taxes took away a man’s liberty to run his business as he saw fit and undermined the individualism that made America great. In the 1920s, they convinced American voters to turn the government over to businessmen, whose policies, once again, concentrated wealth. When the bottom fell out of that system in 1929 with the Great Crash, Americans came together to demand government work for all Americans, rather than a privileged few. The system they created promised a “New Deal” for the American people, and most Americans thought the system that regulated business, provided a basic social safety net, promoted infrastructure, and protected civil rights was so popular it would last forever. But President Ronald Reagan began to undermine that system in the 1980s, insisting that the modern government redistributed the tax dollars of hardworking white men to people like the “welfare queen,” who played the system to live large without working. Like their predecessors from a hundred years before, Reagan and his allies claimed such a system was perilously close to socialism. And, as before, cuts to regulation and taxes helped money—more than $50 trillion—move upward to the richest 1% of Americans. With it moved political power. Republican-dominated states suppressed voting by likely Democratic constituencies until we are now, in 2026, seeing people having to wait for hours to vote or having to march to distant polling places while billionaire Elon Musk pumps at least $446 million into the midterms to buy Republican control of Congress. Still worried about losing, the administration is trying to rig the midterm election. After losing repeatedly in the courts over their demands to segregate 20,000 California ballots they insist might have been cast by noncitizens, it today appealed the question to the United States Supreme Court. California officials have said the list was haphazard and inaccurate, and today, in a different case, a Department of Justice lawyer told a judge it was “fair” to say the list has a “high” error rate. This evening, the Supreme Court denied the administration's emergency appeal to require California officials to set aside those 20,000 ballots. The Republicans’ fear comes from the fact that the open looting of the government in Trump’s second term appears to have revealed to a majority of the American people that the policies the Republican Party has enacted since 1981 benefit only a few. Once again, it seems, Americans are coming together, ready to follow the pattern of the past and rebuild a government that works not just for the wealthy, but for everyone.
127KENGAGEMENTSView on Facebook
officialteamtrump2026-11-03 12:14
Today is Election Day! 🗳️ When you vote Republican, America wins. 🇺🇸 Find your polling location below, head to the polls, and vote Republican: swampthevoteusa.com!
91KENGAGEMENTSView on Facebook
nytimes2026-11-04 06:50
Democrats have clinched the House, giving them full control of Congress and a powerful platform to counter President Trump. Voters delivered a blistering rebuke to Trump, with Democrats flipping a Senate seat in Maine and House districts in corners of the country that had long been considered out of reach. Learn more about how Democrats flipped the House and the Senate at the link in our bio. Photo by kiehart
74KENGAGEMENTSView on Instagram
nytimes2026-11-04 02:15
Senator Jon Ossoff of Georgia, whose race was a must-win for Democrats, won re-election on Tuesday, according to The Associated Press, securing a seat that could help give his party control of the Senate. He defeated Representative Mike Collins, the Republican nominee. Ossoff, a first-term incumbent, entered the midterms as the only Democrat trying to hold onto a seat in a state that President Trump won in 2024. That made him, at least on paper, the most vulnerable Senate Democrat seeking re-election this year. But Ossoff proved an exceptional fund-raiser and an aggressive anti-Trump campaigner. His victory is also sure to catapult his name into more conversations about potential 2028 presidential contenders. Read more about Ossoff and his path to victory at the link in our bio. Photo by nicole_craine
72KENGAGEMENTSView on Instagram
—2026-11-03 14:13
When Obama was casting his ballot for the 2014 midterm elections, a man jokingly told the president not to touch his girlfriend, who was voting next to him. Obama handled the situation with grace, playfully giving the woman a kiss goodbye and telling her boyfriend, "now you're really jealous." #Obama #BarackObama #Vote #Rewind
69KENGAGEMENTSView on Instagram
cnn2026-11-03 14:33
President Donald Trump said that the United States is cutting off $4 billion in aid to Israel at the end of the year because "they don't need it." Trump, speaking to Fox News on the morning of Election Day, suggested that US aid to Israel has become a powerful political talking point for Democrats and questioned why Republicans should "suffer the slings" from candidates like Michigan Democratic Senate nominee Abdul El-Sayed when Israel isn't in need of assistance. The US provides Israel $3.8 billion of military aid a year under a 10-year memorandum of understanding that began in 2018. It is set to expire in 2028. Trump appears to be suggesting he would terminate it at the end of this year. Tap the link in cnn's bio for more. 📸: Brendan Smialowski/AFP/Getty Images
53KENGAGEMENTSView on Instagram

Engagement ranking finds the loudest posts, not a representative sample. No automated accounts appeared in the ranking — a subreddit automoderator's stickied thread collects engagement without being anyone's opinion. Links were live when this page was generated.

HIGHEST-REACH POSTS FROM INSIDE THE US
nytimes2026-11-04 05:02
Democrats seized control of the Senate on Tuesday night, as voters delivered a thorough rebuke to President Trump and handed the party victories in places long considered Republican strongholds. Democrats flipped Senate seats in Iowa, Kansas, Ohio, North Carolina, South Carolina and even Texas, according to The Associated Press, and were in a strong position to take control of the House as they scored victories up and down the ballot. Trump told The New York Times in an interview that he was “absolutely willing to accept those results” and was prepared to work with Democrats. At the link in our bio, read more updates on the midterm elections and analysis from our reporters.
338KENGAGEMENTSView on Instagram
kamalaharris2026-11-03 15:15
There is so much at stake in the midterm elections. If you have already voted: Thank you, and make sure your community is ready. If you haven’t voted yet, make sure you have a plan to vote today, Tuesday, November 3. Find your polling place at IWillVote.com. The power is with the people.
207KENGAGEMENTSView on Instagram
feministnews.us2026-11-03 15:45
Eleven billion dollars. That’s AdImpact’s estimate for what this midterm cost in advertising alone, before you count the mailers, the consultants, the private jets and the $190 million Elon Musk put into a single Senate race in Texas. One House seat in eastern North Carolina became the most expensive in American history at $52 million. Republicans and their allies spent $280 million of the total on ads about trans kids, an issue voters rank dead last. Here’s the math, using the Center for American Progress’s numbers on what a dollar actually buys. Eleven billion is a year of SNAP for about 5 million people. Or a year of federally subsidized housing for roughly 680,000 families. Or, if you’d rather, a decade of maintaining every rural hospital that has closed since 2023. Every one of those is a problem somebody spent the last six months campaigning on. Grocery prices. Rent. Hospitals. And the money that could have touched any of them went instead to 30-second spots telling you to be afraid of your neighbor. This isn’t a both-sides lament. One side raised $2.4 million in a day from 26,000 small donors after a congresswoman defected. The other had Musk. The question isn’t whether money is in politics. It’s whose, and what they expect for it. Polls are open. The cheapest thing in this election is your vote.
133KENGAGEMENTSView on Facebook
HIGHEST-REACH POSTS FROM OUTSIDE THE US
hollywoodunlocked2026-11-03 15:21
Registered Republicans explain why they are voting Blue during the midterm elections. Thoughts? 👇🏾📸: joyannreid
215KENGAGEMENTSView on Instagram
—2026-11-03 14:13
When Obama was casting his ballot for the 2014 midterm elections, a man jokingly told the president not to touch his girlfriend, who was voting next to him. Obama handled the situation with grace, playfully giving the woman a kiss goodbye and telling her boyfriend, "now you're really jealous." #Obama #BarackObama #Vote #Rewind
69KENGAGEMENTSView on Instagram
theshaderoom2026-11-03 21:55
#PressPlay: IKDR! These celebs and influencers made sure to cast their votes for the 2026 midterm elections but #Roomies, did you? 🗳️(SWIPE)✍🏾:#TSRStaffJR
42KENGAGEMENTSView on Instagram
METHOD

How This Was Measured

The window

12:00 AM EST, 3 November to 12:00 AM PST, 4 November 2026 — 03 November 05:00 to 04 November 08:00 UTC, 27 hours. The window is absolute rather than rolling, so every figure describes one snapshot and the parts reconcile with the whole: US 1,163,192 plus outside-US 394,760 equals the total 1,557,952 exactly.

The source

The boolean query of Quid Monitor topic 2957239 — a two-tier rule over all languages, scored at 0.863 precision against a thousand judged posts before this page was built. It is the query only: the saved topic also collects everything its 29 channel accounts post and a licensed news feed, which together add about half as much volume again, most of it not about the midterms. Twitter/X arrives as a 10% sample projected to full volume, so its counts are estimates and cannot be reconciled against individually retrievable posts.

Sentiment

Net sentiment is (positive − negative) ÷ (positive + negative) × 100; neutral posts are excluded from the denominator. Only 7.1% of posts carry a sentiment label at all (110,471 of 1,557,952), so every bar is a split of that labeled slice and not of the whole conversation. Any row under 250 labeled mentions shows thin instead of a score.

Geography

"United States" means a post Monitor located in the US. "Outside the US" is everything else, which includes 177,872 posts carrying no location signal at all; 216,888 carry an identifiable country and those are what the ladder ranks. Treat the non-US total as an upper bound and the country ladder as the floor.

Themes, names and accounts

Themes are boolean rules over post text, not a classifier, and they overlap. People are counted by name match with variants merged into one query. Authors are classified by reading their own posting history; accounts whose names mark them as automated are excluded from the post ranking. Age is absent: Monitor carries no age attribute, and inferring it from the loudest accounts returned no age for 92% of those readable, so no age figure appears anywhere on this page.

What this does not show

This is not a poll and carries no electoral inference. It measures what was posted in public, which over-represents people who post. It does not measure who voted, how they voted, or what the wider public believed. Coordinated activity is not filtered out.

Read the campaign-week report

Generated 04 November 2026 09:07 UTC from Quid Monitor. Metrics may not match the Monitor interface exactly. Read as exploratory.